Disclaimer on religion

🏷  disclaimer · meta-info   —   by Gerry · Jul 2019 · 906 words

In my analyses, I’ll often show that central religious names & symbols have been misused by our hidden rulers for their nasty inside jokes. At the same time I think there’s nothing wrong with people being religious. If you are religious yourself and feel that you cannot accept your religion and my analyses at the same time, please read this disclaimer.

The further you go down in history in your research, the more it seems to become a question about religion, with a strong “monotheistic” emphasis. You encounter countless articles where the authors discuss questions such as: Was Jesus a real person? What does the cross stand for? Did Moses write the Torah? Were Hebrews enslaved by Egyptians? Were pagan religions evil, for worshipping idols? Were monotheistic religions evil, for abandoning nature?

In think these are all the wrong questions to ask. Worse, authors of such articles often try to tie those wrong questions to the question of faith. They imply the “truth” of a religion is somehow bound to its historicity, and to some secret explanation of its symbolism. I think that’s also very wrong, and dangerous.

I’m not religious myself, but I think religions ultimately do not differ much from other ideologies, or really beliefs in general. At their core, they’re often very similar, because most humans click the same way. No matter the background, we all prefer peace over war, cooperation over conflict, stability over chaos, safety over danger, community over loneliness. As humans, we really want to be part of some peaceful, stable group, and need the other humans around us.

I think that is the real basis & value of religious communities. It should not be some obscure terminology or symbolism. For example: If you’re raised Catholic, you’ll be taught about immaculate conception. But very likely, you won’t feel that concept adds the most value to your life. Rather, you’d mostly enjoy the actual real-life benefits of living inside your religious community: company, stability, consolation, hope, spirituality.

Why am I stressing this? It may sound harsh, but I’ve come to think that religions in their instituted form were created by “spooks”, i.e. secret rulers. I think they chose most of the central naming, terminology & symbolism to transport 2 layers of meanings: The official meaning is about some actual true & good thing, like brotherhood, forgiveness, and little people prevailing over evil powers. But by a choice of strange words, there is often a second nasty meaning, about how secret rulers can scam their own subjects.

If you’re religious, or just want to respect religions, you’ll likely find this horrible. You may be tempted to either hate my guts and not read anything I wrote. Or worse, the nasty jokes beneath will make you doubt the visible good message, and make you question your faith. If that really happens, please take option 1: Simply don’t read my stuff, go on with your life and do what feels more meaningful to you.

But there’s a 3rd option: We can to separate the good things, the truths, and the value of the religious message from the messenger. We have to separate it from the spooks & their nasty jokes, which came as ballast, simply because they’ve controlled all publications for millennia. I know separating message & messenger is easier said than done. But if we want to know the truth all the way down, we’ll ultimately have to learn this.

Religions are not unique in this sense: pretty much all human teachings & institutions are built on originally good ideas, but all have been perverted. That’s true for all -isms: nationalism, capitalism, communism, liberalism, libertarianism, conservatism. Today most have an icky feeling to them, but that’s because we’ve only ever known the perverted spooky versions. Originally, all were mostly true & useful core concepts. We wouldn’t want to abandon nations, or liberties, or communes in general, just because they’ve been misused by the spook overlords.

I will therefore continue my research on hidden punnery in religious scripture, and will also share the results. First, because spookery is still very often explained as a battle of religions, or peoples, or races. I will show that this is totally false. Spookery has always been a battle of the powerful against the powerless, cross-cutting all other borders. Second, because the encrypted information beneath religious scripture is our main public source to details about the inner workings of spookery. If we understand those, we can better combat it.

Currently, I am mostly analyzing texts tied to Judaism, because our hidden rulers style themselves as “Jewish”. But I will eventually move on to pagan religions, Christianity & Islam, and I can already tell you that the results will be the same: All religious scripture is riddled with spooky riddles. Just sometimes the visible narratives has been given a stronger role.

If you feel you cannot stand this, or that the benefit isn’t worth the cost to your faith, you can just decide to stay away from my research. I won’t say it’s no loss, but it’s not a big loss. Understanding the present is much more important than understanding the ancient past. You can read some more of Miles’ papers instead, for a more positive outlook. He is more careful to protect Christianity, and also has a much more humorous writing style than me.

As usual, make up your own mind, and don’t be too harsh on yourself.

🏷  disclaimer · meta-info